[radvd-devel-l] Problem----Down one interface,Up another!
Greg Daley
greg.daley at eng.monash.edu.au
Wed Sep 7 01:44:56 EDT 2005
Hi Nathan,
Sorry for the late reply.
Nathan Lutchansky wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, John wrote:
>
>
>>No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info
>>1304 73.970193 fe80::20a:ebff:fe9b:fada ff02::1 ICMPv6 Router advertisement
>>No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info
>>1305 74.019727 :: ff02::16 ICMPv6 Unknown (0xce) (Unknown (0x00))
>>No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info
>>1306 74.699676 :: ff02::16 ICMPv6 Unknown (0xce) (Unknown (0x00))
>>No. Time Source Destination Protocol Info
>>1307 74.870249 fe80::20a:ebff:fe98:68b7 ff02::1 ICMPv6 Router advertisement
>>......
>> We can see,the interval between last RA from eth1 and first RA from eth2 is nearly
>>
>>1s. Can this interval be reduced?How?
>
>
> The router just sent an RA (1304) only 50 msec before getting the RS, and
> routers won't reply to an RS immediately if they have sent an RA recently.
> You can change this delay with MinDelayBetweenRAs in radvd.conf, but you
> really should have a good reason for doing so.
Indeed. There are reasons and means to do this outlined in RFC 3775
(Mobile IPv6), but there are serious overhead issues which reduce its
applicability.
>
>> And what the destination--ff02::16 mean?Can it be eliminated?
>
>
> Why? ff02::16 is the well-known address for router discovery... -Nathan
Actually, ff02::16 is the well known multicast group for MLDv2.
The groups for solicited nodes' addresses (and ff02::2 - all routers -
if it is a router) are being joined when the interface is being
brought up.
These messages aren't associated with router discovery (except
peripherally).
Greg
More information about the radvd-devel-l
mailing list