[radvd-devel-l] radvd crash with multiple interfaces when 1 interface comes back up
reubenhwk at gmail.com
Mon May 10 02:35:23 EDT 2010
What is the best way to check for conformance and do regression testing in
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Reuben Hawkins <reubenhwk at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll try over the next week or so to submit timerless code which honours
> the delay...
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:40 PM, Pekka Savola <pekkas at netcore.fi> wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Reuben Hawkins wrote:
>>> This is happening in the latest from CVS in the timer code? Can you
>>> reproduce this crash in the code I submitted which removes the
>>> timers? It seems like the timers are the source of half the problems
>>> submitted to the mailing list. I stand by removing the
>>> timers. Building a poll/select based solution will dramatically simplify
>>> the code and debugging. Please let me know what
>>> guidelines I should follow to get my code integrated into the next
>> Yes, this happens with the latest CVS. I have not tried reproducing with
>> polling based mechanism, but I don't think it would exist there.
>> I agree that timers are causing problems (and likely continue to do so),
>> and we would be better off without them, or by implementing better locking
>> when using them (anyone interested in looking at this?).
>> In order for select/poll-based mechanism to be considered, it would need
>> to support all MUSTs from the spec and preferably SHOULDs also. I recall
>> there was some discussion about this late last year, e.g. relating to random
>> delay feature.
>> Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the
>> Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds."
>> Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
>> radvd-devel-l mailing list : radvd-devel-l at litech.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the radvd-devel-l