[radvd-devel-l] DeprecatePrefix option

Reuben Hawkins reubenhwk at gmail.com
Wed Mar 9 10:28:41 EST 2011


On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Mark Smith <
radvd at 02a76c927861ca7413a122f2a73a0d37.nosense.org> wrote:

> Hi Reuben,
>
>
> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:07:23 -0800
> Reuben Hawkins <reubenhwk at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Mark Smith <
> > radvd at 02a76c927861ca7413a122f2a73a0d37.nosense.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> <snip>
> > >
> >
> >
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > Can you verify that this this is for RFC4861 Section 5.5.3?   RFC4862
> > section 5.5.3. has a "Router Advertisement Processing" and an 'e'
> section.
> > Is this what you meant?
> >
>
> Yes, I meant RFC4862, so it's typo in the manual page text. I can fix it
> and send through another version of the patch if you like. Are there any
> other things that can be improved or should be changed?
>
> Thanks,
> Mark.
>


Hi Mark,

No need to send another patch.  I'm going to review it for a little while
(the RFC number is easy enough to change manually) before committing it.

Thanks,
Reuben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.litech.org/pipermail/radvd-devel-l/attachments/20110309/29abaae4/attachment.html>


More information about the radvd-devel-l mailing list