[radvd-devel-l] Re: radvd-devel-l digest, Vol 1 #32 - 2 msgs
Pekka Savola
radvd-devel-l@litech.org
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:38:46 +0300 (EEST)
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 Sourajeet.Mohanty@lntinfotech.com wrote:
> You could do e.g.:
>
> eth0:
> 3ffe:ffff:0:1::/64
> 3ffe:ffff:0:2::/64
> 3ffe:fffe:0:0::/64
>
> eth1:
> 3ffe:ffff:0:3::/64
> 3ffe:ffff:0:4::/64
> 3ffe:fffe:0:1::/64
>
> There are many many ways.
>
> ===>
> Ok lets take ur example.
> Can I say that the link on eth0 is different network from link on eth1 ?
> Does it mean that all prefixes advertised on eth0 or eth1 represent one
> network ?
That question has no meaning. You need to be more precise especially with
the world 'network'.
One prefix is one IP-level network.
--
Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security. -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords