[radvd-devel-l] Re: radvd-devel-l digest, Vol 1 #32 - 2 msgs

Pekka Savola radvd-devel-l@litech.org
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 19:38:46 +0300 (EEST)


On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 Sourajeet.Mohanty@lntinfotech.com wrote:
> You could do e.g.:
> 
> eth0:
>    3ffe:ffff:0:1::/64
>    3ffe:ffff:0:2::/64
>    3ffe:fffe:0:0::/64
> 
> eth1:
>    3ffe:ffff:0:3::/64
>    3ffe:ffff:0:4::/64
>    3ffe:fffe:0:1::/64
> 
> There are many many ways.
> 
> ===>
> Ok lets take ur example.
> Can I say that the link on eth0 is different network from link on eth1 ?
> Does it mean that all prefixes advertised on eth0 or eth1 represent one
> network ?

That question has no meaning.  You need to be more precise especially with 
the world 'network'.

One prefix is one IP-level network.

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,
Netcore Oy                   not those you stumble over and fall"
Systems. Networks. Security.  -- Robert Jordan: A Crown of Swords