[radvd-devel-l] Why not start if routing is disabled?

Pekka Savola pekkas at netcore.fi
Fri May 7 01:21:30 EDT 2010

On Fri, 7 May 2010, Pekka Savola wrote:
> With this clarification, do you feel your suggested patch should be merged?

Sorry for confusion in writing my response.  I meant to say that the 
forwarding behaviour check cannot be changed unless the situation has 
changed, but nonetheless this part of the patch could be merged for 
clarity (but not sure if it's needed):

>>  -                       flog(LOG_WARNING, "IPv6 forwarding seems to be
>>  disabled, but continuing anyway.");
>>  +               flog(LOG_WARNING, "Global IPv6 forwarding seems to be
>>  disabled, continuing anyway.");

Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

More information about the radvd-devel-l mailing list