[radvd-devel-l] DeprecatePrefix option

[Mark Smith]

Hi Reuben,

On Wed, 9 Mar 2011 07:28:41 -0800
Reuben Hawkins <reubenhwk at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Mark Smith <
> radvd at 02a76c927861ca7413a122f2a73a0d37.nosense.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Reuben,
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 21:07:23 -0800
> > Reuben Hawkins <reubenhwk at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Mark Smith <
> > > radvd at 02a76c927861ca7413a122f2a73a0d37.nosense.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > <snip>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Mark,
> > >
> > > Can you verify that this this is for RFC4861 Section 5.5.3?   RFC4862
> > > section 5.5.3. has a "Router Advertisement Processing" and an 'e'
> > section.
> > > Is this what you meant?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I meant RFC4862, so it's typo in the manual page text. I can fix it
> > and send through another version of the patch if you like. Are there any
> > other things that can be improved or should be changed?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mark.
> >
> 
> 
> Hi Mark,
> 
> No need to send another patch.  I'm going to review it for a little while
> (the RFC number is easy enough to change manually) before committing it.
> 

Have you had much of a chance to review the patch? I'm keen to
implement some of the other "deprecation" options over the weekend if
what I've done above is pretty much ok.

Thanks,
Mark.