[radvd-devel-l] radvd v1.9.4-rc1 tarball?

Reuben Hawkins reubenhwk at gmail.com
Tue Sep 17 15:31:55 EDT 2013


Hi Sedat,

I'll check on the rca thing, but won't use a numbering scheme where the
actual release number, 1.9.4, isn't reflected in the actual version number
or filename.  I'm going to stick with major.minor.revision. To me,
1.9.3.901 is on the 1.9.3 branch, not 1.9.4.

Would the numerical sorting work if I changed to 1.9.4-1rc, 1.9.4-2rc, etc?

Thanks,
reuben


On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek at gmail.com> wrote:

> "Latest Release Candidate
>
> September 17, 2013 - Version 1.9.4rc1 updates:
>
> IPv6 forwarding setting should be 1 or 2
> Performance fix in netlink message processing
> fix for kernels with no NETLINK_NO_ENOBUFS defined
>
> Download
>
> Source for radvd is available as a gzipped tar file. SHA1 hash is also
> listed below.
>
> radvd-1.9.4rca.tar.gz (5145367a881c4957e13cd9724154bdb9385788fd)" <---
> Typo: rca? rc1?
>
> I recommend to use 1.9.3.901 as a synonym for 1.9.4-rc1 (your
> notation: 1.9.4rc1).
> 902 = rc2
> 903 = rc3
> etc.
> All that rcN numbers are not numerically comparable but you can use it
> as some marketing gag.
> ( See projects on FreeDesktop.Org (FDO), Red Hat/Fedora, KDE, etc. [1]
> as an example. )
>
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/refs/tags
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.litech.org/pipermail/radvd-devel-l/attachments/20130917/c6833337/attachment.html>


More information about the radvd-devel-l mailing list