[spook-l] Progressive JPEG.
Nathan Lutchansky
lutchann at litech.org
Sat Nov 13 15:46:25 EST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:
> I would like to know if there are some plans for supporting more
> webbrowser-features in spook, such as possibly Progressive JPEG.
Progressive JPEG? It sounds like you're talking about pushing JPEGs in a
multipart/x-mixed-replace stream, a la camserv. The CVS tree contains
support for both multipart streaming and MJPEG-over-RTP.
> A lot of camservers seems to support hacking in JPEG-frames in a motion
> video through Progressive JPEG.
Yes, and I found that method so distasteful that I wrote Spook. :-)
> Another idea would perhaps be the ability to hack in support for a webpage
> with the refresh-tag set to something like a few seconds? Some output like
> that would be GREAT.
It's easy enough to create an HTML file on a usual webserver with the
refresh header set in a meta tag. I know several users are doing this.
This gives you the flexibility to format the page and set up the refresh
any way you like, instead of using something hard-coded into Spook.
> Otherwise, thanks for a great camserver. I haven't found anything with even
> closely the same potential as spook. :)
Thanks for the compliment! And if you set up a public Spook server,
please post about it here... -Nathan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBlnKkTviDkW8mhycRAlD9AKCNE5Gt6f1s9Ft4O8DwX0od+tuVaQCgg9Ni
tQYRYz/Hc0q6e6SfTY8Viuk=
=XcV6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the spook-l
mailing list