[spook-l] Progressive JPEG.

Nathan Lutchansky lutchann at litech.org
Sat Nov 13 15:46:25 EST 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Ulrik Mikaelsson wrote:

> I would like to know if there are some plans for supporting more 
> webbrowser-features in spook, such as possibly Progressive JPEG.

Progressive JPEG?  It sounds like you're talking about pushing JPEGs in a
multipart/x-mixed-replace stream, a la camserv.  The CVS tree contains 
support for both multipart streaming and MJPEG-over-RTP.

> A lot of camservers seems to support hacking in JPEG-frames in a motion
> video through Progressive JPEG.

Yes, and I found that method so distasteful that I wrote Spook.  :-)

> Another idea would perhaps be the ability to hack in support for a webpage 
> with the refresh-tag set to something like a few seconds? Some output like 
> that would be GREAT.

It's easy enough to create an HTML file on a usual webserver with the
refresh header set in a meta tag.  I know several users are doing this.  
This gives you the flexibility to format the page and set up the refresh
any way you like, instead of using something hard-coded into Spook.

> Otherwise, thanks for a great camserver. I haven't found anything with even 
> closely the same potential as spook. :)

Thanks for the compliment!  And if you set up a public Spook server,
please post about it here...  -Nathan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBlnKkTviDkW8mhycRAlD9AKCNE5Gt6f1s9Ft4O8DwX0od+tuVaQCgg9Ni
tQYRYz/Hc0q6e6SfTY8Viuk=
=XcV6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the spook-l mailing list